Couple Who Run Exclusive Swingers Club Reveal Controversial Vetting Rule

A married couple from Leeds have sparked widespread debate after revealing the strict screening policy they use for guests attending their exclusive lifestyle events.

Tanya and Ashley Marum, who married in 2019, say their journey into consensual non-monogamy began unexpectedly after a friend posed a candid question shortly after their wedding. What started as a private conversation between newlyweds eventually evolved into a business hosting large-scale events within the open-relationship community.

Today, the couple organizes bi-monthly gatherings that attract hundreds of attendees. But it is not the size of their events drawing attention — it’s the rules.

How It Began

According to the Marums, their introduction to the lifestyle was rooted in curiosity and communication. Tanya has said she initially declined the suggestion of expanding their relationship boundaries, but the question opened the door to a deeper conversation about desires and trust.

They describe their experience as a gradual process built on transparency and mutual consent. Over time, what began as personal exploration developed into hosting private social events for like-minded couples.

The pair say the lifestyle strengthened their communication and trust. They emphasize that clear boundaries and constant discussion are essential to maintaining stability.

From Personal Exploration to Business

Frustrated by what they describe as a lack of organized, age-appropriate social spaces, the Marums began hosting small meetups. Those gatherings eventually grew into structured events with formal guest lists, applications, and venue rentals.

As their reputation expanded, so did demand. The couple now reportedly hosts events attended by hundreds of participants.

However, attendance is not automatic.

The Controversial Rule

The Marums have openly acknowledged that they operate a strict vetting process for guests. Applicants must submit photos and basic background information before receiving approval.

Ashley has stated that they prioritize attendees who “take care of themselves” and fit what they describe as an attractive, well-presented standard.

That admission has sparked backlash online, with critics calling the rule exclusionary and superficial.

Supporters argue that private events have the right to maintain curated guest lists, particularly in environments centered on personal comfort and mutual attraction.

The couple maintains that their screening process is about maintaining a specific atmosphere rather than judging individuals personally.

Communication and Boundaries

Despite the controversy, Tanya has stressed that the lifestyle is not a solution for struggling relationships.

“If you’re trying to fix cracks in your relationship, this isn’t the answer,” she has said in interviews. “It should only ever be an addition, not a repair tool.”

They argue that successful non-monogamous arrangements require strong communication and trust before any expansion of boundaries.

The couple also note that transparency about expectations and limitations is critical in maintaining emotional balance.

Public Reaction

Reaction to their story has been sharply divided.

Some view the couple’s openness about non-traditional relationships as a sign of changing social norms and greater honesty about adult choices.

Others question whether the aesthetic vetting rule crosses ethical lines or promotes unhealthy standards.

The debate highlights a broader cultural conversation about exclusivity, personal preference, and the evolving definition of modern relationships.

A Growing Trend

Consensual non-monogamy has gained more mainstream visibility in recent years, with increased discussion in media and online communities.

While still controversial in many circles, lifestyle events and private clubs operate legally in various countries under clear consent guidelines.

The Marums’ story illustrates how personal exploration can evolve into entrepreneurial opportunity — though not without criticism.

For now, the couple says their priority remains the same: protecting their marriage and curating events that align with their standards.

Whether seen as bold honesty or divisive selectivity, their approach has undeniably captured public attention.